[aur-requests] [PRQ#3639] Deletion Request for syncthing-bin
amiad [1] filed a deletion request for syncthing-bin [2]: The package found in offical repos. https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?name=syncthing [1] https://aur4.archlinux.org/account/amiad/ [2] https://aur4.archlinux.org/pkgbase/syncthing-bin/
On 02/07, notify@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
amiad [1] filed a deletion request for syncthing-bin [2]:
The package found in offical repos. https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?name=syncthing
Jason, is there any reason to keep this -bin package? -- Sincerely, Johannes Löthberg PGP Key ID: 0x50FB9B273A9D0BB5 https://theos.kyriasis.com/~kyrias/
Request #3639 has been rejected by Barthalion [1]. [1] https://aur4.archlinux.org/account/Barthalion/
On 05/07/15 at 11:40am, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
On 02/07, notify@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
amiad [1] filed a deletion request for syncthing-bin [2]:
The package found in offical repos. https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?name=syncthing
Jason, is there any reason to keep this -bin package?
I uploaded it for those of us that don't use Go. I am OK with it remaining, but if you'd prefer it removed I can live with that… Cheers, /J -- http://jasonwryan.com/ GPG: 7817 E3FF 578E EEE1 9F64 D40C 445E 52EA B1BD 4E40
On Mon, 6 Jul 2015 05:03:02 +1200
Jason Ryan
On 05/07/15 at 11:40am, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
On 02/07, notify@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
amiad [1] filed a deletion request for syncthing-bin [2]:
The package found in offical repos. https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?name=syncthing
Jason, is there any reason to keep this -bin package?
I uploaded it for those of us that don't use Go.
I am OK with it remaining, but if you'd prefer it removed I can live with that…
Cheers,
/J
The package on official repositories doesn't depend on Go (which in fact builds only (almost) static binaries. I'd rather keep your package around anyway – sometimes there are bugs in our package that are not reproducible in the upstream binaries (and this is exactly why I rejected this request). BP
On 06/07, Jason Ryan wrote:
On 05/07/15 at 11:40am, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
On 02/07, notify@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
amiad [1] filed a deletion request for syncthing-bin [2]:
The package found in offical repos. https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?name=syncthing
Jason, is there any reason to keep this -bin package?
I uploaded it for those of us that don't use Go.
I am OK with it remaining, but if you'd prefer it removed I can live with that…
You don't build packages in [community], nor does built Go packages depend on the go package, which is why I asked. Unless there is anything different between the [community] package and the syncthing-bin package I see absolutely no reason to keep this package? -- Sincerely, Johannes Löthberg PGP Key ID: 0x50FB9B273A9D0BB5 https://theos.kyriasis.com/~kyrias/
On 05/07/15 at 08:51pm, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
On 06/07, Jason Ryan wrote:
On 05/07/15 at 11:40am, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
On 02/07, notify@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
amiad [1] filed a deletion request for syncthing-bin [2]:
The package found in offical repos. https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?name=syncthing
Jason, is there any reason to keep this -bin package?
I uploaded it for those of us that don't use Go.
I am OK with it remaining, but if you'd prefer it removed I can live with that…
You don't build packages in [community], nor does built Go packages depend on the go package, which is why I asked. Unless there is anything different between the [community] package and the syncthing-bin package I see absolutely no reason to keep this package?
Go is a makedepend: I prefer not to {,un}install it for every build. /J -- http://jasonwryan.com/ GPG: 7817 E3FF 578E EEE1 9F64 D40C 445E 52EA B1BD 4E40
On 05/07, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote:
The package on official repositories doesn't depend on Go (which in fact builds only (almost) static binaries. I'd rather keep your package around anyway – sometimes there are bugs in our package that are not reproducible in the upstream binaries (and this is exactly why I rejected this request).
Ah, that's fair then. Weird that the bugs aren't reproducible though.. different Go versions maybe? -- Sincerely, Johannes Löthberg PGP Key ID: 0x50FB9B273A9D0BB5 https://theos.kyriasis.com/~kyrias/
On 06/07, Jason Ryan wrote:
On 05/07/15 at 08:51pm, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
On 06/07, Jason Ryan wrote:
On 05/07/15 at 11:40am, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
On 02/07, notify@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
amiad [1] filed a deletion request for syncthing-bin [2]:
The package found in offical repos. https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?name=syncthing
Jason, is there any reason to keep this -bin package?
I uploaded it for those of us that don't use Go.
I am OK with it remaining, but if you'd prefer it removed I can live with that…
You don't build packages in [community], nor does built Go packages depend on the go package, which is why I asked. Unless there is anything different between the [community] package and the syncthing-bin package I see absolutely no reason to keep this package?
Go is a makedepend: I prefer not to {,un}install it for every build.
Yes, and again, you don't build packages in [community] the maintainer in the official repos do. -- Sincerely, Johannes Löthberg PGP Key ID: 0x50FB9B273A9D0BB5 https://theos.kyriasis.com/~kyrias/
On 05/07/15 at 09:20pm, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
On 06/07, Jason Ryan wrote:
On 05/07/15 at 08:51pm, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
On 06/07, Jason Ryan wrote:
On 05/07/15 at 11:40am, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
On 02/07, notify@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
amiad [1] filed a deletion request for syncthing-bin [2]:
The package found in offical repos. https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?name=syncthing
Jason, is there any reason to keep this -bin package?
I uploaded it for those of us that don't use Go.
I am OK with it remaining, but if you'd prefer it removed I can live with that…
You don't build packages in [community], nor does built Go packages depend on the go package, which is why I asked. Unless there is anything different between the [community] package and the syncthing-bin package I see absolutely no reason to keep this package?
Go is a makedepend: I prefer not to {,un}install it for every build.
Yes, and again, you don't build packages in [community] the maintainer in the official repos do.
Yes, don't mind me. Now that I think about it, I cannot even recall why I uploaded it in the first place… Sorry for the noise. /J -- http://jasonwryan.com/ GPG: 7817 E3FF 578E EEE1 9F64 D40C 445E 52EA B1BD 4E40
On 06/07, Jason Ryan wrote:
On 05/07/15 at 09:20pm, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
Yes, and again, you don't build packages in [community] the maintainer in the official repos do.
Yes, don't mind me.
Now that I think about it, I cannot even recall why I uploaded it in the first place… Sorry for the noise.
Was just curious. :) Anyway, we'll keep it, considering Bart's message. -- Sincerely, Johannes Löthberg PGP Key ID: 0x50FB9B273A9D0BB5 https://theos.kyriasis.com/~kyrias/
participants (4)
-
Bartłomiej Piotrowski
-
Jason Ryan
-
Johannes Löthberg
-
notify＠aur.archlinux.org