[aur-requests] [PRQ#8727] Deletion Request for lldb-svn
aeden [1] filed a deletion request for lldb-svn [2]: The llvm-svn AUR package should provide lldb instead. It simply doesn't make sense to use an lldb from the tip-of-tree while keeping release versions of the other LLVM toolchain components. If a single LLVM module is tip-of-tree, then the others should be as well. - aeden@csail.mit.edu [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/aeden/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/lldb-svn/
Moreover, I just tried installing lldb-svn with yaourt and got this: Checked out revision 310187. ==> Validating source files with sha256sums... llvm ... Skipped cfe ... Skipped lldb ... Skipped ==> Extracting sources... -> Creating working copy of trunk svn repo... -> Creating working copy of trunk svn repo... -> Creating working copy of trunk svn repo... ==> Starting pkgver()... ==> Updated version: lldb-svn 310187-1 ==> Starting build()... -> Exporting Clang in the LLVM tree ... -> Exporting LLDB in the LLVM tree ... -> Applying Archlinux-specific patch ... sed: can't read lib/Makefile: No such file or directory ==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build(). Aborting... ==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build lldb-svn. ==> Restart building lldb-svn ? [y/N] ==> --------------------------------- On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 3:57 PM, <notify@aur.archlinux.org> wrote:
aeden [1] filed a deletion request for lldb-svn [2]:
The llvm-svn AUR package should provide lldb instead.
It simply doesn't make sense to use an lldb from the tip-of-tree while keeping release versions of the other LLVM toolchain components. If a single LLVM module is tip-of-tree, then the others should be as well.
- aeden@csail.mit.edu
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/aeden/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/lldb-svn/
On Sat, 5 Aug 2017 19:57:17 +0000 (UTC) notify@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
aeden [1] filed a deletion request for lldb-svn [2]:
The llvm-svn AUR package should provide lldb instead.
It simply doesn't make sense to use an lldb from the tip-of-tree while keeping release versions of the other LLVM toolchain components. If a single LLVM module is tip-of-tree, then the others should be as well.
- aeden@csail.mit.edu
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/aeden/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/lldb-svn/
And you think the best way to deal with that is to delete the entire package from the AUR?
Request #8727 has been accepted automatically by the Arch User Repository package request system: The user Alad deleted the package.
participants (3)
-
Anthony Eden
-
Doug Newgard
-
notify＠aur.archlinux.org