[aur-requests] [PRQ#8727] Deletion Request for lldb-svn
aeden [1] filed a deletion request for lldb-svn [2]: The llvm-svn AUR package should provide lldb instead. It simply doesn't make sense to use an lldb from the tip-of-tree while keeping release versions of the other LLVM toolchain components. If a single LLVM module is tip-of-tree, then the others should be as well. - aeden@csail.mit.edu [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/aeden/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/lldb-svn/
Moreover, I just tried installing lldb-svn with yaourt and got this:
Checked out revision 310187.
==> Validating source files with sha256sums...
llvm ... Skipped
cfe ... Skipped
lldb ... Skipped
==> Extracting sources...
-> Creating working copy of trunk svn repo...
-> Creating working copy of trunk svn repo...
-> Creating working copy of trunk svn repo...
==> Starting pkgver()...
==> Updated version: lldb-svn 310187-1
==> Starting build()...
-> Exporting Clang in the LLVM tree ...
-> Exporting LLDB in the LLVM tree ...
-> Applying Archlinux-specific patch ...
sed: can't read lib/Makefile: No such file or directory
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().
Aborting...
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build lldb-svn.
==> Restart building lldb-svn ? [y/N]
==> ---------------------------------
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 3:57 PM,
aeden [1] filed a deletion request for lldb-svn [2]:
The llvm-svn AUR package should provide lldb instead.
It simply doesn't make sense to use an lldb from the tip-of-tree while keeping release versions of the other LLVM toolchain components. If a single LLVM module is tip-of-tree, then the others should be as well.
- aeden@csail.mit.edu
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/aeden/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/lldb-svn/
On Sat, 5 Aug 2017 19:57:17 +0000 (UTC) notify@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
aeden [1] filed a deletion request for lldb-svn [2]:
The llvm-svn AUR package should provide lldb instead.
It simply doesn't make sense to use an lldb from the tip-of-tree while keeping release versions of the other LLVM toolchain components. If a single LLVM module is tip-of-tree, then the others should be as well.
- aeden@csail.mit.edu
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/aeden/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/lldb-svn/
And you think the best way to deal with that is to delete the entire package from the AUR?
Request #8727 has been accepted automatically by the Arch User Repository package request system: The user Alad deleted the package.
participants (3)
-
Anthony Eden
-
Doug Newgard
-
notify@aur.archlinux.org