stylemistake [1] filed a request to merge bitwig-studio-demo [2] into bitwig-studio [3]: There is an opinion, that the "demo" prefix is misleading, because this application is a full application (without any content cut or whatsoever) and needs only license activation. Currently me (@stylemistake) and @abique expressed this opinion. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/stylemistake/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/bitwig-studio-demo/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/bitwig-studio/