[aur-requests] [PRQ#4870] Deletion Request for vulkan
1ace [1] filed a deletion request for vulkan [2]: extra/vulkan-sdk & extra/vulkan-icd-loader replace these vulkan-sdk & vulkan-loader. Not sure what to do about the different name though; should I push an update with the new name (vulkan-icd-loader) and `replaces=(vulkan- loader)` to make those who installed my package use the new name, and in a week (when hopefully people have upgraded to the new name) actually delete this one? [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/1ace/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/vulkan/
Request #4870 has been rejected by Muflone [1]: If you have questions about this package please write in the aur- general mailing list or send a post to the forum. If you're totally sure to delete this package please file a deletion request again [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Muflone/
Hi all,
This request has been rejected by Muflone, and I don't quite understand; is
there a reason to keep these packages around?
I'm pretty sure my packages in the AUR have been superseded by Laurent
Carlier's (lcarlier/lordheavy) in [extra], and can only confuse users.
Cheers,
Eric
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 12:45 AM,
1ace [1] filed a deletion request for vulkan [2]:
extra/vulkan-sdk & extra/vulkan-icd-loader replace these vulkan-sdk & vulkan-loader.
Not sure what to do about the different name though; should I push an update with the new name (vulkan-icd-loader) and `replaces=(vulkan- loader)` to make those who installed my package use the new name, and in a week (when hopefully people have upgraded to the new name) actually delete this one?
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/1ace/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/vulkan/
Hi Eric
Hi all, This request has been rejected by Muflone, and I don't quite understand; is there a reason to keep these packages around? I'm pretty sure my packages in the AUR have been superseded by Laurent Carlier's (lcarlier/lordheavy) in [extra], and can only confuse users.
There was nothing wrong in your request but as it was expressed, in a question form. How could I reply you if I'd have accepted it? How could you apply changes to the deleted package? Feel free to submit the deletion request again once you cleared your questions.
1ace [1] filed a deletion request for vulkan [2]:
extra/vulkan-sdk & extra/vulkan-icd-loader replace these vulkan-sdk & vulkan-loader.
There's no vulkan-sdk package in extra. If it's named in a different way please explain, I've no experience about vulkan. The vulkan-loader package could be freely deleted instead.
Not sure what to do about the different name though; should I push an update with the new name (vulkan-icd-loader) and `replaces=(vulkan- loader)` to make those who installed my package use the new name, and in a week (when hopefully people have upgraded to the new name) actually delete this one?
You could add a comment to the package to immediately inform all the users that have subscribed your package. I don't think further actions are required. Regards -- Fabio Castelli aka Muflone
participants (3)
-
Eric Engeström
-
Muflone
-
notify＠aur.archlinux.org