[aur-requests] [PRQ#10017] Deletion Request for micro
nycko123 [1] filed a deletion request for micro [2]: Hi there is no point of existing of this package. It's a waste of space :) A provide micro-bin. micro-git builds from sources. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/nycko123/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/micro/
On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 23:30:41 +0000 (UTC) notify--- via aur-requests <aur-requests@archlinux.org> wrote:
nycko123 [1] filed a deletion request for micro [2]:
Hi there is no point of existing of this package. It's a waste of space :) A provide micro-bin. micro-git builds from sources.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/nycko123/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/micro/
It's existence is to build a release from source, you know, like a normal package. -bit and -git are variants of this typical package. Your vandalism of this package is the only reason that it's currently in bad shape. Someone trying to undo this crap and bring back a good package is a *good* thing.
Please disregard PRQ#10016 and PRQ#10017. Fixing. Doug, will you allow me to adopt the other package "in danger"? cheers! mar77i Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#10017] Deletion Request for micro Local Time: December 16, 2017 5:24 AM UTC Time: December 16, 2017 4:24 AM From: aur-requests@archlinux.org To: notify--- via aur-requests <aur-requests@archlinux.org> Doug Newgard <scimmia@archlinux.org>, nycko123@gmail.com
On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 23:30:41 +0000 (UTC) notify--- via aur-requests aur-requests@archlinux.org wrote:
nycko123 [1] filed a deletion request for micro [2]: Hi there is no point of existing of this package. It's a waste of space :) A provide micro-bin. micro-git builds from sources. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/nycko123/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/micro/
It's existence is to build a release from source, you know, like a normal package. -bit and -git are variants of this typical package. Your vandalism of this package is the only reason that it's currently in bad shape. Someone trying to undo this crap and bring back a good package is a good thing.
Request #10017 has been rejected by Muflone [1]: the package was updated [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Muflone/
participants (3)
-
Doug Newgard
-
Mar77i
-
notify＠aur.archlinux.org