[aur-requests] [PRQ#13586] Deletion Request for popcorntime-stable-bin
test0 [1] filed a deletion request for popcorntime-stable-bin [2]: Duplicate of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/popcorntime-bin/ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/test0/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/popcorntime-stable-bin/
It really is not though, the sources are clearly different and there's been lots of changes to the PKGBUILD as well. How can I contest this? On Sun, Dec 23, 2018, 00:50 <notify@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
test0 [1] filed a deletion request for popcorntime-stable-bin [2]:
Duplicate of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/popcorntime-bin/
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/test0/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/popcorntime-stable-bin/
On 12/22/18 6:13 PM, Kostis Karantias via aur-requests wrote:
It really is not though, the sources are clearly different and there's been lots of changes to the PKGBUILD as well. How can I contest this?
The package claims to be "stable" but that means that the other package is arguably wrong. it makes no sense to have a "stable" package when the default is supposed to be stable unless the package is suffixed with something like "-dev" or "-nightly" or "-git". I would provide the counter-argument to your contestation, that you should instead discuss it with the maintainer for the other package. Why does the other package not use stable sources? If there is a sufficiently good reason to not use stable sources, then why do you want the stable version? (If you have a reason to want the stable version, this is an argument against not packaging something else instead as the default package). According to the comments on the popcorntime-bin package: neitsab commented on 2018-02-04 23:57 @lesto who flagged as OOD: No official release happened since 2016-10 (https://github.com/popcorn-official/popcorn-desktop/releases), so flagging has no basis. If you want the latest build, use https://ci.popcorntime.sh/job/Popcorn-Time-Desktop/lastSuccessfulBuild/. .... neitsab commented on 2018-02-05 00:08 I pushed a modified PKGBUILD using the CI builds to get something a bit fresher. If a new release is ever made, I'll switch back to that. If you'd rather I create a new package let me know. ... neitsab commented on 2018-03-23 23:41 I removed the checksums for the downloaded binaries since we are using the "last successful build" permalink from the CI server. If somebody would rather this package keep using the old, outdated release from the main website just say so and I'll create a separate package for the CI builds. ... ... ... There are a couple problems with this logic, beginning with the fact that completely unverified, unchecksummed code is a terrible way to package anything. And this doesn't provide a monotonically updating pkgver, because it doesn't provide any sort of updating pkgver at all. It continually identifies itself as the latest stable release, even though it packages different code every time you rebuild it. -- Eli Schwartz Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
Request #13586 has been accepted by polyzen [1]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/polyzen/
participants (3)
-
Eli Schwartz
-
Kostis Karantias
-
notify@aur.archlinux.org