[PRQ#40147] Deletion Request for josm-stable
yochananmarqos [1] filed a deletion request for josm-stable [2]: Duplicate of josm community package. "The submitted PKGBUILDs must not build applications already in any of the official binary repositories under any circumstances. Check the official package database for the package. If any version of it exists, do not submit the package. If the official package is out-of- date, flag it as such. If the official package is broken or is lacking a feature, then please file a bug report." -- https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AUR_submission_guidelines#Rules_of_submissi... [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/yochananmarqos/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/josm-stable/
I know the rules and followed it: - If the official package is out-of-date, flag it as such. This was done more than *seven* month ago (2022-07-06). - If the official package is broken or is lacking a feature, then please file a bug report. It's lacking an active maintainer. I created a bugreport, not because it is out of date, but because of non-active maintenance. https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/75049 This bug was closed with a pretty baffling comment instead of beeing handled. So I decided to make a fork here, just to make an updated package available to everyone and to avoid that more tickets will be created by other people. I like to stress that I don't want to maintain this package - I would be really happy to delete it again, as soon as it gets maintained in the official package repository. --- Now after more than seven months I created another ticket, because of the lacking maintenance. https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/77460 This resulted in this deletion request for my aur package and another closure request for my created account ticket - instead of getting the actual issue resolved. I don't get why users get punished just because they want to make issues known, or provide a temporary maintenance. I don't like this tone of communication which seems to be the norm here. Please provide guidance. Best regards and thanks in advance! Ruben Kelevra 11.02.2023 16:23:02 notify@aur.archlinux.org:
yochananmarqos [1] filed a deletion request for josm-stable [2]:
Duplicate of josm community package.
"The submitted PKGBUILDs must not build applications already in any of the official binary repositories under any circumstances. Check the official package database for the package. If any version of it exists, do not submit the package. If the official package is out-of- date, flag it as such. If the official package is broken or is lacking a feature, then please file a bug report."
-- https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AUR_submission_guidelines#Rules_of_submissi...
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/yochananmarqos/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/josm-stable/
Request #40147 has been Accepted by muflone [1]: as explained in the rules and in the messages you received with the deletion requests, you simply **don't create duplicated packages**, regardless the state of the package in the official repository [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/muflone/
participants (2)
-
notify＠aur.archlinux.org
-
RubenKelevra