[PRQ#40896] Deletion Request for wolframscript
RubenKelevra [1] filed a deletion request for wolframscript [2]: This package violates this part of the AUR submission guidelines: "Packages that use prebuilt deliverables, when the sources are available, must use the -bin suffix." This package downloads a prebuilt binary and does not use the -bin suffix. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/RubenKelevra/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wolframscript/
Il 07/04/23 17:56, notify@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto:
RubenKelevra [1] filed a deletion request for wolframscript [2]:
This package violates this part of the AUR submission guidelines:
"Packages that use prebuilt deliverables, when the sources are available, must use the -bin suffix."
This package downloads a prebuilt binary and does not use the -bin suffix.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/RubenKelevra/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wolframscript/
wolframscript is a very proprietary program and don't even have a public download, users need to register to get the upstream file. Even if it was a disguised -bin pkgbuild it is better to create the -bin variant and fill a merge request to preserve votes, comments and subscription. In that case you're welcome to contact the maintaner before making deletion requests
Request #40896 has been Rejected by Antiz [1]: Nonfree and **closed source** software does not necessarily have to use the `-bin` prefix as there can never be any source based packages for them (since the sources are closed). See https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Nonfree_applications_package_guidelines#Pac... [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Antiz/
participants (2)
-
Fabio Loli
-
notify@aur.archlinux.org