On 02/21/2018 03:17 PM, Maxim Baz via pacman-contrib wrote: This is not a valid patch. It appears to have been sent with: Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 Did you change `mail.content_disposition_type = 0` and send this email as an attachment by any chance? The raw contents of the (inline attachment) patch are: Basically allow any extension after '.tar' except '.tar.sig'. This is needed to correctly count the possible candidates for removal. Signature files are correctly considered later in the script. Fixes FS#57503 Signed-off-by: Maxim Baz <git@maximbaz.com> ---  src/paccache.sh.in | 2 +-  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/paccache.sh.in b/src/paccache.sh.in index 49680be..94bedfa 100644 --- a/src/paccache.sh.in +++ b/src/paccache.sh.in @@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ for cachedir in "${cachedirs[@]}"; do     # note that these results are returned in an arbitrary order from awk, but     # they'll be resorted (in summarize) iff we have a verbosity level set.     IFS=$'\n' read -r -d '' -a cand < \ -      <(printf '%s\n' "$PWD"/*.pkg.tar?(.+([^.])) | pacsort --files | +      <(printf '%s\n' "$PWD"/*.pkg.tar?(.+([^.])) | grep -v '\.sig$' | pacsort --files |           pkgfilter "$keep" "$scanarch" \              "${#whitelist[*]}" "${whitelist[@]}" \              "${#blacklist[*]}" "${blacklist[@]}") -- 2.16.2 The best way to send a patch is using git-send-email(1) This way will definitely not work, because of file corruption. -- Eli Schwartz Bug Wrangler and Trusted User