Ciprian Dorin, Craciun wrote:
About download-agents for makepkg. (This is why I've bothered the developers of pacman this morning with compilation issues... :))
So I wanted to be able to make PKGBUILD and makepkg extract sources for Git repositories. And after asking on the arch-general, I was pointed to the following bug: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/7816
As a consequence I've started hacking and commed up with the following patches (put at the end). (I've ended up with four pathes from git format-patch... Should I put only the diff between maint branch and my branch?)
Also below is the description on the bug-tracker:
~~~~ I've made some hacking staring from pacman Git repository. My work is available at (branch patches/git-dlagent): http://gitorious.org/~ciprian.craciun/pacman/ciprian-craciun-patches
In summary: * added a script: /usr/bin/git-dlagent that takes exactly two arguments: URL and output. * updated /etc/makepkg.conf to include the following URL's: git://, git+file://, git+http://, git+https://, git+ssh://, git+rsync;
<snip> Hi, Thanks for tackling this. There are some interesting ideas in your patch. From my point of view, this is far too complex for inclusion into makepkg. The addition of six new download URLs to makepkg (and that is just for git and not cvs,svn,hg,...) and requiring a download script just seems overboard. Taking a look at git PKGBUILDs on the AUR and the git prototype distributed with the Arch from the ABS package, what is really wanted is to reduce this: --start-- _gitroot="GITURL" _gitname="MODENAME" build() { cd "$srcdir" msg "Connecting to GIT server...." if [ -d $_gitname ] ; then cd $_gitname && git pull origin msg "The local files are updated." else git clone $_gitroot fi msg "GIT checkout done or server timeout" msg "Starting make..." rm -rf "$srcdir/$_gitname-build" git clone "$srcdir/$_gitname" "$srcdir/$_gitname-build" cd "$srcdir/$_gitname-build" --end-- with a "source=(git...)" line. I'm sure that you have covered some edge cases that can not be handled very easily in this fashion and I see some added functionality in your changes. However, I am not sure we need that complexity in 99% of use cases. Your patch has pointed out some interesting issues. Especially the issue of checksums and how they are handled when the source is not a real source file. Allan