4 Dec
2007
4 Dec
'07
8:38 p.m.
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 01:19:44PM +0100, Nagy Gabor wrote:
3. commit 55a7455135e2d8f2e118928f634dc7976ab6c8b4 and asymmetric search-for-satisfier caused a strange situation: # pacman -S foo --ignore foo-dependency "install foo-dependency anyway?" is asked twice, if this foo-dependency is a literal satisfier, because in the search-for-provisions we use alpm_depcmp, which finds literals again...
Uh, I thought I couldn't reproduce this, because I was answering the default question (yes). Now I see, but I don't consider this to be a big problem. Why would you answer no to the question anyway? When you do, pacman will just fail.