On 31/12/14 03:08, Mohammad_AlSaleh wrote:
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 01:59:51AM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
On 31/12/14 01:14, Mohammad Alsaleh wrote:
* Add -9 which is the highest compression level. * Use lzma for secondary compression.
I believe I said a patch adding '-9 -S djw' would be accepted in the last discussion of this.
How does lzma for secondary compression compare to djw in terms of memory footprint and speed?
Using an aging Laptop (Core 2 Due). Time is the samllest in 4 runs.
inkscape: 05.765s 139.50MiB default 09.748s 235.02MiB -9 -S djw 09.315s 242.86MiB -9 -S lzma
clang: 15.492s 140.46MiB default 36.503s 236.11MiB -9 -S djw 39.293s 243.68MiB -9 -S lzma
Thanks - difference is negligible so I will pull your patch. Allan