Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH 1/4] Revert refactoring in fa0c1e14

On 29/06/14 11:45, Dave Reisner wrote:

On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 11:27:31AM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:

...

This will cause the code to break as soon as we handle another signal such as SIGWINCH...

Signed-off-by: Allan McRae ---

Well... that didn't last long.

Seems to me the thing to do is to declare a mapping between signum and handler, rather than declaring a signal handler for everything, and then littering the logic with if/else.

I can send a patch on top of my SIGWINCH patch...

Sure. A