21 Jul
2008
21 Jul
'08
10:01 a.m.
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com> wrote:
Apparently the static strings were a show stopper to Dan. I don't have a problem with static strings, since it removes the malloc/free overhead and also simplifies the code. As always with dynamic strings, we have the choice between duplicating all free calls, or using goto.
But anyway, here is a new patch using strdup/free instead of static arrays.
This breaks sync1000, sync1003 and upgrade075 pactest, but I have not yet been able to figure out why.