24 Feb
2009
24 Feb
'09
3:57 a.m.
On 24/02/2009, at 2:56 AM, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 1:47 AM, Brendan Hide <brendan@swiftspirit.co.za
wrote: Again, this will be properly fixed as soon as pacman correctly takes into account the errors given when doing the actual deployment. Personally, I like the idea of adding sanity checks - but only if they're done properly. ;)
I wouldn't say that - we've talked about "proper transactions" for a long time, and are still nowhere near a proper solution. So don't expect this to be fixed soon, unless you're writing the patches :)
Has there been any (real) discussion about transactions? Perhaps a wiki about design ideas would be good.