Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH] Use limits.h for PATH_MAX

On 19/12/10 03:56, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Allan McRae<allan@archlinux.org>  wrote:
>> We use PATH_MAX everywhere by including limits.h so there is no
>> point in doing a check for it in a different header when dealing
>> with FreeBSD's libfetch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Allan McRae<allan@archlinux.org>
> Looks fine, just two things I'll point out and let you decide how to
> act on them:
> 1. We check for limits.h but never use the macro shield anywhere, it
> looks like. Probably common enough (and required by us anyway) that it
> doesn't matter.

It is a POSIX header, so no need for all that macro shield stuff.   I'll 
kill the check.

> 2. strings.h ->  not used anywhere in libalpm, but still included in this list.

I'll just kill it as part of this patch.

Allan