On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 4:39 AM, Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu> wrote:
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu> wrote:
From 054eae27537989dee76a06fac882fb38702144d5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu> Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 22:41:29 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Introduce -Qlq
With --quiet flag, -Ql doesn't print the package name only lists files. I made --quiet documentation up-to-date (I also added -Sgq/-Qgq).
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Thanks! I like this, and thanks for updating the docs.
One small point- does anyone see a good reason to keep the version information on a -Qo operation? It is the only user of the quiet flag that prints it, and it would be more consistent to not show it. I'm going to go ahead and change that.
I also realized this and it seems odd, indeed. If there is no real reason for printing version there (I am not the guy who made the "print version here" decision), I also vote for killing version from -Qqo. One more thing about -Qqo: I am not sure we need "error: No package owns /foo/bar" with that, but I am a bit unsure about this.
Already done: http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=pacman.git;a=commitdiff;h=20017354f7ccb58bf... I'm not sure about the error thing either. Silence might be best, although then it is harder to tell the different failure cases apart (file not found, no package owns, specified a directory, etc.). -Dan