17 Jan
2007
17 Jan
'07
10:34 p.m.
On 1/17/07, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
On 1/17/07, Jürgen Hötzel <juergen@hoetzel.info> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 03:37:06PM -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
Currently the "alpm_list" type is considered fairly "private", hiding (through the use of the _ prefix) a handful of useful routines.
Should it be renamed if it is going to be public? Something along the lines of alpmlist_t?
Yeah, I was going to go with alpm_list_t, just to keep the underscore scheme going.