On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 4:26 AM, Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 10:47 PM, Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org> wrote:
i don't want to flame or anything, but what's the purpose of this? is there any program that would make use of such an archive? except that if you put it out to http then broken out files are browsable, while if you tar it up (like the rpm guys do with srpm) then the user has to download the whole source package, even if he/she is only interested in the buildscript or patches.
I agree, I also think that keeping the buildscript/patches (archlinux specific) and the real source files (upstream) separate is nicer and more flexible.
So what are you saying, did anyone actually look at the patch? I didn't change the existing --source option one bit, that *still* only includes local source files. All I did was add a completely new --allsource option that allows you to also build an src.tar.gz with all source, local and remote. How much more flexible can we get than having two options here? -Dan