On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
On 03/09/13 07:48, Allan McRae wrote:
On 03/09/13 06:52, Jason St. John wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
Ping on this question.
(and lesson for everyone - the more minimal your changes in a patch, the more chance it gets accepted quickly...)
Should I resubmit this with the BASENAME change done in a separate patch? Or should I resubmit with each file done in a separate patch?
No need. I believe I got the OK for this on IRC. I will pull this patch next time I do some pacman work.
But it would help if you could resend the patch rebased on master. I am having difficulty applying it and do not have the time to fix it myself.
A
Sure. I resubmitted it here: https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2013-September/017780.htm... Jason