27 Jan
2006
27 Jan
'06
7:13 p.m.
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 09:51:47PM +0100, Aurelien Foret <aurelien@archlinux.org> wrote:
Sounds good to me. I applied the patch, with a little rework (I dropped the R/W access test surrounding the lock creation/destruction).
erm if we unlock the db in trans_release(), then we should call it in pacman_remove() even there isn't any error: http://darcs.frugalware.org/darcsweb/darcsweb.cgi?r=pacman;a=plain_commitdif...; udv / greetings, VMiklos -- Developer of Frugalware Linux, to make things frugal - http://frugalware.org