First of all, don't worry; I'm under no illusion that the pie-in-the-sky Subject line is anything that will happen in the near future, nor even necessarily a goal for the project (given just how finicky -Weverything is). Basically, I'm wondering whether sporadic patches addressing the sorts of things "clang -Weverything" gripes about would be considered welcome contributions, or nitpicking. By "sporadic patches", I mean that any of this sort from me would come when I felt like working on a coding project but didn't have anything particularly in mind. As a sample, I've made two patches addressing some of its earliest warnings. The first changes several headers to (say) #define IDENTIFIERS rather than _IDENTIFIERS. The second adds ALPM_ERR_OK = 0 to the _alpm_err_t enum. Some functions which return an _alpm_err_t return value were returning 0 on success, but there was no 0 value enumerated--not actively harmful, but still an oddity. If this sort of thing isn't of interest, I definitely get it. I just figured that an RFC with patches attached would provide something more concrete to discuss than one without. Cheers, Ivy