29 Jun
2007
29 Jun
'07
4:09 p.m.
On 6/29/07, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/29/07, Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com> wrote:
Another thing I missed earlier, why is this deps.h needed ? Isn't it only in the backend anyway ? I don't think pacman should have access to it.
This is correct- The only headers that should need inclusion from the pacman frontend are those that were already there- alpm.h and alpm_list.h. The rest are not installed on the system. I can fix this if you want, otherwise I'll let you push a new version.
Ah, there are bigger issues here, now aren't there. We don't have public accessor methods for pmdepend_t, even though we have them for pmdepmissing_t. Wow how I love libalpm. Do we really need both of these types? This seems a bit odd here. -Dan