On 4/9/20 12:24 pm, Eli Schwartz wrote:
On 9/3/20 9:38 PM, Andrew Gregory wrote:
On 08/21/20 at 08:20pm, Ronan Pigott wrote:
From: Ronan Pigott <rpigott@berkeley.edu>
Signed-off-by: Ronan Pigott <rpigott@berkeley.edu>
Sure, I guess. pacman-conf is meant for use in scripts; who on Earth is running it in a terminal?
It can be pretty useful for running without options in order to copy-paste your pacman.conf for help, but that's again not really a use case for completions.
I was working on the principle, that if someone submitted them, we can include them. Adds no overhead, beyond keeping them up to date.
I guess we want the same completions in bash_completion.in, but given I don't really have a good use for it myself, I'm not sure I'll bother writing it myself...
If someone submits, I will include them. If not, I don't care. A