17 Jun
2009
17 Jun
'09
5:43 a.m.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:34 AM, Pierre Schmitz<pierre@archlinux.de> wrote:
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 07:27:11 Aaron Griffin wrote:
As a rather wild aside here... what would be the downside of sticking the entire PKGBUILD in the pacman DB? How much size would that add?
Wont make that much sense (as it is not easily parsable and without patches etc. quite useless) However for community/ core/ extra/ kde-unstable/ local/ testing/ it is (gzip compressed) 1,1M
But you're just kidding, right?
Not exactly - I'm half serious. I mean, a) it'd give us all the information needed to build the package, b) it'd allow these scripts to work without an ABS tree. I'm not saying pacman would _use_ it, I just think it'd be kinda neat.