On Dec 19, 2007 11:04 AM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
On Dec 19, 2007 1:24 AM, Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu> wrote:
Well, I agree, that this will be rarely used (mainly >). So if you can show me a clean way (not kernel26 provision) to say that "foo depends on kernel-2.6.x" I will revert this immediately (this was the only reason for implementing)
I thought our version compartors already worked for this case? That is, for foo-1.2.3, doing a depends=(foo>=1.2) will work just fine
I think what he's getting at is he wants a dependency on kernel26 version 2.6.x for any x. Saying depends=(kernel26>=2.6) will match kernel26 for any version >= 2.6, which is not the same thing, because it will match versions 2.7, 2.8, 3.0, and 1000.