On 20/06/15 04:32, Florian Pritz wrote:
On 18.06.2015 14:46, Allan McRae wrote:
$ pacman -Fl abs abs /etc/ abs /etc/abs.conf
What happens if the package exists in multiple repos? Will I get the list of only one of them or all of them?
It now only prints the first occurance.
Can I use -Fl testing/abs to get the list of the testing package only?
Implemented.
Search file lists: $ pacman -Fs libpng.so libpng 1.6.16-1: /usr/lib/libpng.so darktable 1.6.7-1: /usr/lib/darktable/plugins/imageio/format/libpng.so lib32-libpng 1.6.16-1: /usr/lib32/libpng.so
Search with regexes: $ pacman -Fsx kcm.*print.*\.so print-manager 15.04.2-1: /usr/lib/qt/plugins/kcm_printer_manager.so kmymoney 4.7.2-1: /usr/lib/kde4/kcm_kmm_printcheck.so
Anything else that is worth implementing before I do the much needed rebase on that branch?
case (in)sensitive search?
I am not interested in doing this...
Also why is the output format different between -Fl, -Fo and -Fs? I think they should probably all use the same one (the one with "$pkgname $pkgver: $file") so it's easier to parse. If this is implemented you can ignore the -q wishes above.
I see that the output is similar to -Ql and -Qo, but I think it's still better to use a more verbose and easier to parse (e.g. `cut -d\ -f 2-`) format. Especially with regard to the possibility of a package being in multiple repositories which can't happen with -Q.
-Fo and -Fs now always show the repo for the results. $ pacman -Fs pacman core/pacman 4.2.1-1 usr/bin/pacman usr/share/bash-completion/completions/pacman extra/xscreensaver 5.32-1 usr/lib/xscreensaver/pacman $ pacman -Fo /usr/lib/libmpfr.so /usr/lib/libmpfr.so is owned by testing/mpfr 3.1.3-1 /usr/lib/libmpfr.so is owned by core/mpfr 3.1.2.p11-1 A