2007/2/13, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com>:
On 2/13/07, Giovanni Scafora <linuxmania@gmail.com> wrote:
2007/2/13, Pierre Schmitz <pierre@archlinux.de>:
Well, at the moment bugs cannot assigned to TUs. Perhaps it might be a good idea to introduce a community-section; but i don`t think we should discuss this at pacman-dev ;-)
I think the field comments is sufficient.
So, what if a package has 20 or so bugs over the course of it's lifetime. Each bug having 2-3 responses from the maintainer and the users. That's a lot of comments with no order to it. One could say "delete the old ones", but then you lose history, which is important sometimes.
AUR comments are NOT sufficient to replace a full blown bug tracker. Hell, if it WAS sufficient, why don't we move the AUR comments scheme to the official package list? No more package bugs in the bug tracker, use the package comments. Sounds like a bad idea. For the same reason, deeming AUR comments sufficient for bug tracking is equally as bad.
Well, there's no strict line between comments and bugtracker. Imagine tons of bugs like "Add license field". ;-) You wanna kill mr.bughunter? :-D -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)