5 Apr
2020
5 Apr
'20
11:38 a.m.
On 4/5/20 1:19 PM, @RubenKelevra wrote:
I was wondering if there's interest from you or the team to implement native IPFS support in pacman?
The idea is, to extend the current database definition, by an additional field, which holds the Content-ID necessary to fetch a package from IPFS.
If the database gets extended by an additional field for every new network layer people come up with, where do we draw the line? This needs a solution that does not require the database format to be altered to suit protocol-specific metadata.
Best regards,
Ruben
-R