5 Dec
2007
5 Dec
'07
11:01 a.m.
Well, this is not a big problem -- just ugly. Why would I answer no? Because I don't like foo-dependency at all, that's why I put foo-dependency into IgnorePkg ;-) And I hope that pacman will find an other (provision) satisfier. So pacman won't fail by default (this was the goal of 55a7455135e2d8f2e118928f634dc7976ab6c8b4).
As I see, I must commit a trivial patch for this...
Bye
Here you are. ---------------------------------------------------- SZTE Egyetemi Könyvtár - http://www.bibl.u-szeged.hu This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/