16 Sep
2009
16 Sep
'09
1:22 p.m.
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu> wrote:
In this case we should clearly choose dep-ng dependency satisfier, because it has an older version installed. Unfortunately "computing all satisfiers then choosing" is much slower then "search for literal" (if provisions are not needed), so speed is a show-stopper here atm (like with FS#15500).
What about not trying to workaround backend limitation, and just improve the code independently of the backend ? When everyone is enough pissed off by pacman slowness, it would be a bigger motivation to fix that.