Dan McGee wrote:
On 7/2/07, Alexander Baldeck <kth5@archlinuxppc.org> wrote:
Andrew Fyfe wrote:
Are there any objections to removing CHOST from makepkg.conf?
It's never seen by package Makefiles as it's not exported, and as a general rule it's a BAD idea to mess with CHOST.
If there's no objections I'll do up a patch.
Andrew CHOST is a good idea to have if you are on a i686-pc-linux-gnu with a x86_64-pc-linux-gnu machine. It will go and build stuff with x86_64_pc-linux-gnu if not forced by using --target to most configures.
Cheers,
-Y
Well we should do one of two things: 1. Get rid of CHOST 2. Export it in makepkg with the rest of the variables
Thoughts?
-Dan
_______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list pacman-dev@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
+1 for exporting +1 for commenting out by default in makepkg.conf Andrew