On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Bryan Ischo <bji-keyword-pacman.3644cb@www.ischo.com> wrote:
I hate to be reduced to begging, but after weeks of no one taking my patches, this is what I have to do. I jumped through every hoop I was asked to jump through to get my patches accepted (and to be honest, there were ALOT of hoops). My most recent patches apply to the source code without any conflicts and address all outstanding issues raised on this list. Dan McGee said that if I addressed those issues, he'd take my patches. Well I did, weeks ago, and yet, my patches are not in the tree.
So this is one last attempt on my part to try to get a pacman dev to apply my patches to the master git tree. It should be trivially easy - should take all of a few seconds.
First, I'm sorry. I have a *heck* of a lot going on in my real life and job right now, and I normally would never want to leave people hanging like this. I've had your patches on my TODO list for a while. "a pacman dev" is me. That is how it has been for a while, and although I'm not as devoted to it as I used to be, I still think I am in the best position to control the master code. Your patches, although having gone through a good review, are still not trivial. If you've noticed, the only patches I've applied in the last month are trivial things or things I've done myself. Yes, just taking your code in and applying it would take a few seconds. But that isn't how it always works- I still need to test them, as I hate pushing broken code out anywhere. A lot of us on this list run pacman from git, and I really don't want to trash their or my computer's database. I'm not saying your patches would do this- but making sure is something I have to do, so blindly patching code isn't something I do. Once again, I'm sorry its taken so long, but I have about 80 things asking for my attention in Arch-land, and I'm just not motivated to do it all right this minute, nor do I have the time. -Dan