29 Jan
2006
29 Jan
'06
7:04 a.m.
On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 10:32:11PM +0100, Aurelien Foret <aurelien@archlinux.org> wrote:
Indeed, I noticed it right after applying your lock/unlock move patch.
In fact, the trans_release call has always been missing, even before your patch (a transaction must be released, even if it happens to succeed!).
Note that the same also applied to pacman_add, pacman_sync and pacman_deptest too.
ok, but why don't you removed the unlock stuff from alpm_release()? without removing that the lockfile will be removed by pacman's cleanup() even if an anouther pacman is already running udv / greetings, VMiklos -- Developer of Frugalware Linux, to make things frugal - http://frugalware.org