On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 05:40:44PM -0500, Dan McGee wrote:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
On 14/10/10 01:36, Dan McGee wrote:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Allan McRae<allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
On 14/10/10 01:11, Allan McRae wrote:
On 14/10/10 00:59, Dan McGee wrote:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Allan McRae<allan@archlinux.org> wrote: > > On 14/10/10 00:11, Dan McGee wrote: >> >> I think this was alluded to a while back, but we are starting to show >> some problems with our naming scheme and bash variable/function >> naming >> rules: >> >> /usr/bin/makepkg: line 1831: declare: `package_python-xlwt': not a >> valid identifier >> >> With latest makepkg built from git. >> > > Any chance of some more info on how to replicate? At least the > pkgname line > or even the whole PKGBUILD?
Haha, my bad.
wget http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-xlwt/python-xlwt.tar.gz bsdtar xf python-xlwt.tar.gz cd python-xlwt makepkg
I can not replicate with 4.1.x or 3.2.x.
^ these are bash version....
Hmmmmm. Build output attached, and here is the relevant part of this particular version of makepkg:
1825 # test for available PKGBUILD functions 1826 if declare -f build>/dev/null; then 1827 BUILDFUNC=1 1828 fi 1829 if declare -f package>/dev/null; then 1830 PKGFUNC=1 1831 elif [[ $SPLITPKG -eq 0 ]]&& declare -f package_${pkgname}
/dev/null; then
1832 SPLITPKG=1 1833 fi
OK - I can replicate. I forgot my makepkg-git package builds from my working branch which had not been rebased to master after the last couple of pushes. But it turns out that was a good thing as there were only a couple of patches that could cause this issue:
05f0a28932c1acab7a9ddb58435d69626dad54da is the first bad commit
commit 05f0a28932c1acab7a9ddb58435d69626dad54da Author: Nezmer <git@nezmer.info> Date: Tue Oct 12 02:23:16 2010 +0300
Use sysconfdir, localstatedir, BASH instead of hardcoded values
This applies to contrib/ files, our scripts, and the documentation.
Dan: fix 'make clean' in contrib/ directory.
Signed-off-by: Nezmer <git@nezmer.info> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
....
which does this to the top of makepkg:
#!/bin/sh -e
which is bad... even when we symlink that to bash as it starts in standards compliance mode. So you have not broken bash, you have broken configure!
So looking at configure output:
checking for bash... /bin/sh
and the configure check:
AC_CHECK_PROGS([BASH], [bash bash4 bash3], [false])
So... WTF? It turns out the issues is that the BASH variable seems to be used elsewhere and we have a naming conflict...
Oh man, this makes so much more sense. WTF, configure?
The shell itself sets this, try the following (which is what ./configure ends up doing): #!/bin/sh echo $BASH
I think I have a patch on the way...
-Dan
My bad. I would have caught this If I tested with Arch. This does not happen in FreeBSD. What is setting BASH exactly?