On 1/31/07, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
Pacman 3.0 Release Schedule =========================== 2007-01-31
For those of you used to these sorts of schedules, this may seem a big aggressive, for those of you NOT used to it, it may seem slow. I think this is a decent middle ground. I would not want either testing cycle to go LESS than one week, but they could go longer.
We should also setup a bug tracker category (temporarily) for pacman 3.0 testing, to get a concise category for bugs and the like. This was suggested by Dan.
The following schedule should give us enough time to iron out any and all issues remaining. It is not set in stone, but gives us something to strive for.
* 01-31 to 02-07 (one week): RC Testing. Remaining bug fixes This is our current setup where it seems to be only devs and people on pacman-dev doing testing
* 02-07 to 02-14 (one week): Public testing - NOT in repos yet Provide a URL in a news item or forum announcement
* 02-14 / 02-15: Release to [testing] repo At this point we will also remove the "side-by-side" scheme (pacman-rc -> pacman) currently used
* 02-15 to 02-22 (one week): Public testing This is aggressive and will require us to actually prod people to test / report things
* 02-22 / 02-23: Release to [current]
* 02-23 - 03-01: Watch and wait for some time. There will be problems at this point and we should address them ASAP.
* 03-01 +: Begin pacman 3.1 feature additions and other fun stuff
Just wanted to poke you all about the RC. wizzo sent a nice BUG email (see the list), but so far, that's all I've seen. Does anyone else have any issues with the current RC?