On 6/19/07, Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
2007/6/19, Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>:
For the ones who check this ML, but not the forums (since lordbad always double post :d), phrakture gave a link to this : http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/7132
(thread is here : http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=34303 )
yeah, similar ideas about categories/tags/whatever were rised during SCM repo structure discussion, AUR2 brainstorming etc. Nice to see the idea didn't die :-) Though I'm not sure if it's worth to put categorization data into packages inself.
I disagree- when it deals directly with the package, why NOT include it in the description (PKGBUILD) of the package?
Wouldn't webinterface-only categorization be enought for browsing/searchig packages?
We try to make most things possible from the command line- I don't think we should limit ourselves to a web-interface only listing of categories either, especially if implementing it in both places (as opposed to one) is trivial anyway. -Dan