19 Feb
2016
19 Feb
'16
1:30 a.m.
On 19/02/16 04:56, Dominik Fischer wrote:
More than a ready proposal for a change, this patch is an inquiry about the reason for the time stamp. As noted above, I find it quite impractical while maintaining packages in the AUR. Above that, the information seems redundant, as all package repositories are versioned with git, where each commit already carries a date, usually only a few seconds behind the time stamp.
The .SRCINFO file is timestamped so we know the time that the source package is generated (much like the .PKGINFO file for packages). For those that distribute source packages, this is useful information. I will take a patch that only prints the comments when generating the .SRCINFO file and not when --printsrcinfo is used. A