1 Jan
2022
1 Jan
'22
6:19 a.m.
On 27/12/21 08:01, jeremy@merelinux.org wrote:
From: Jeremy Huntwork <jeremy@merelinux.org>
This is a proof of concept that shows how asignify can be used instead of gpgme to validate packages signed with the asignify tool.
I'm not doing a full review of the patch (although I note some pure whitespace changes creeping in). This looks a reasonable approach to include. Note it would need to be setup as an either/or with gpgme, much like the openssl/nettle implementations are. If you go ahead and work this into a formal patchset submission (please not all one patch!), I can provide specific comments. Cheers, Allan