On 19/02/16 13:23, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 4:54 AM, Daniel Wallace <danielwallace@gtmanfred.com> wrote:
I kind of agree with this and would rather have a prepare switch to turn it on with no extract.
That appears to be Allan's suggestion more or less; restoring the old behavior but also providing a --prepare option to allow running prepare() with --noextract. I'm advocating that such an option has a tiny or even nonexistent use case, to the point that it should not be implemented at all; i.e.: it would be inelegant to have such an option.
I'm going to pull this patch. But if a good use-case for running prepare() with --noextract is presented, either you need to provide a patch providing a --prepare flag, or this will be reverted. Allan