On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Bryan Ischo <bji-keyword-pacman.3644cb@www.ischo.com> wrote:
Dan McGee wrote:
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "The official pacman repository".
The branch, master has been updated via 2268981ebf562a7dda1e788dbd931e48adf9fabb (commit) via 9d661240fe77127fbede95066f38f12cad598e2d (commit) via f57f8d33862050acc8d131710c100ba47877e675 (commit) via 02685504012a4880e599b15f1060f6bd0bf48797 (commit) via a309a016bfed9f67452f2a6556fb4391fd55b34e (commit) via c8a41b7d6da7f820754a07cb085687ea5e110f85 (commit) via c590ac0997b5c82ddf9115191e9ac5c79efde227 (commit) from 1c4633ea2cbc01cfd7929509724951615827c482 (commit)
Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those revisions in full, below.
Thank you for taking my patches, and thanks for fixing the whitespace issues therein.
My patches fix bug 9395; should I post in that bug noting such? Or should I wait until a version of pacman is released to the public that includes these changes?
Post a comment for sure, pointing out the commit sha1s. I'll mark it as due in 3.3. RE: library version numbers- we always bump them on a .X release, so no worries there. We had already changed the library signature anyway. -Dan