On Jan 9, 2008 11:00 AM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 9, 2008 10:58 AM, Karolina Lindqvist <karolina.lindqvist@kramnet.se> wrote:
onsdag 09 januari 2008 skrev Aaron Griffin:
Actually, I'd prefer if the symbols were NOT in klibc. Being that this is early-userspace, we want to minimize the size and decompression overhead as the entire rest of the system is waiting for this to complete.
Assuming this is a corner case, could we set things up such that options=(strip) forces the strip?
The symbols are needed for building of klibc-extras, klibc-udev and I think, also klibc-module-init-tools.
I think you missed the point here, Aaron. It is hard to compile anything against a shared lib if it has *no symbols at all*. Actually impossible as far as I know...
I meant debugging symbols and all that... there was a period of time when they were all being built with debug enabled.
And options=(strip) would already force the strip, and that is the makepkg.conf default anyway.
I meant this in a different way, but now realize that it sounded stupid. Even forcing the strip blows things up because it detects the type wrong, so yeah, back to square one.