3 Mar
2008
3 Mar
'08
2:51 p.m.
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 11:30:41AM +0100, Nagy Gabor wrote: > > > How is that possible? > > [*] I dunno, I asked utf8 users on #archlinux.hu channel, and I got 'no > problem' > > feedback. (And I've never heart problems about Hungarian translation.) > > > > > And why the obstination for not using utf8? > > * I don't really need that now, and most of my stuffs is in iso8859-2. > > * See this poll: http://hup.hu/node/50144 > > * so I interpret [*] as for "everyone" > > > > Does that poll say that 82% of the users who voted use UTF-8? Well, if the > majority wins, that means the translation should stay in utf8. > If the reason wins, utf8 should be used as well. Not using a fine standard > when there is one is stupid. > > Besides, the translation-help file has the following : > ""In addition, for all new translations we would strongly recommend using > UTF-8 > encoding."" > > You can try using convmv if you have filenames to convert, and recode if you > have text files to convert. > Well, whatever you decide, please keep libalpm's and pacman's po in sync (now one of them is utf8, one of them is latin2). I leave the decision to you, but personally I (the translator;-) still vote to iso8859-2. Note: I didn't _changed_ the encoding, it was in iso8859-2, when I started to work on vmiklos's translation. Bye ---------------------------------------------------- SZTE Egyetemi Könyvtár - http://www.bibl.u-szeged.hu This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/