On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 04:50:08PM -0600, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
Now, I've noticed that you distribute code directly from _your_ repo. Your repo indicates that it is "Frugalware's package manager" and there is not a single reference to "Arch" or "Archlinux" in there at all.
hm. should pacman be distro-independent? in that case i would propose the following: 1) revert the changes like: - Object holding data from a pacman package. + Object holding data from an ArchLinux package. or - """Creates a pacman package archive. + """Creates an ArchLinux package archive. and so on 2) i would review our tree in case it contains such Frugalware-specific statements
You guys distribute source directly from your own repo, with functionality changes beyond the original codebase (things which were "develop[ed] independantly of the rest").
hm? every functional change is submitted here afaik could you say an example? (i assume an s/pkg.tar.gz/fpm/ is not a functional change) udv / greetings, VMiklos -- Developer of Frugalware Linux, to make things frugal - http://frugalware.org