On 2/16/07, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2/16/07, Aaron Griffin <aaron@archlinux.org> wrote:
-----------+ package.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
Index: pacman-lib/lib/libalpm/package.c diff -u pacman-lib/lib/libalpm/package.c:1.69 pacman-lib/lib/libalpm/package.c:1.70 --- pacman-lib/lib/libalpm/package.c:1.69 Wed Feb 14 11:15:09 2007 +++ pacman-lib/lib/libalpm/package.c Fri Feb 16 14:37:00 2007 @@ -156,12 +156,10 @@ /* package should be ignored (IgnorePkg) */ _alpm_log(PM_LOG_WARNING, _("%s-%s: ignoring package upgrade (%s)"), local_pkg->name, local_pkg->version, pkg->version); - cmp = 0; } else if(_alpm_pkg_istoonew(pkg)) { /* package too new (UpgradeDelay) */ _alpm_log(PM_LOG_WARNING, _("%s-%s: delaying upgrade of package (%s)"), local_pkg->name, local_pkg->version, pkg->version); - cmp = 0; } }
Hmmm this one snuck in there. I had made this change yesterday and forgot about it. It's untested, and was only the beginning of a full change.
Is this something we should revert, or not worry about it? -Dan