6 Mar
2007
6 Mar
'07
9:31 p.m.
Hi! Yes, the package maintainer should "correct" the unusual version naming by set 3.19.01 or similar as package version. Bye, Nagy Gabor Once again, no right way of doing this. How do we know if the real
On Mar 6, 2007, at 11:13 AM, Nagy Gabor wrote: package version is 3.19.01 and not 3.1.901 or 3.190.1. This isn't a thing pacman should have to take care of; the package itself should have a "current" version number. ~ Jamie / yankees26