19 Dec
2007
19 Dec
'07
7:24 a.m.
I'm not sure you missed this mail, but just in case : http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-December/010527.html
I have to side with Aaron here, actually, I'm just going to quote what he said : "That said, if someone wants to add in support for > and < comparators, I wouldn't complain. It just sounds like "feature creep" to me - it's solving a problem no one encounters on a day to day basis."
That is, I don't find it very useful either, but since it doesn't add much code, it's not a big deal.
Well, I agree, that this will be rarely used (mainly >). So if you can show me a clean way (not kernel26 provision) to say that "foo depends on kernel-2.6.x" I will revert this immediately (this was the only reason for implementing) Bye