19 Sep
2007
19 Sep
'07
5:42 a.m.
Bringing this back up (don't want any in-fighting here guys). On 8/31/07, Travis Willard <travis@archlinux.org> wrote:
So, my points are:
1) Backend configuration should be split into a different file from frontend configuration. 2) A library outside libalpm should be responsible for parsing, at least, the backend configuration file and feeding that into libaplm, to maximize code re-use.
Please comment and help me flesh this out - I think we're on the right track here. If we can get a solid idea of what would be the best way to handle this, I'll start hacking it together.
Travis, what's the status on this? I'm still really on the fence about this - both sides have very strong points, and I really don't know where to go with it.... - Aaron