18 Jul
2007
18 Jul
'07
1:02 p.m.
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 02:57:09PM +0200, ngaba@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu wrote:
Do you mean the same pseudo target code that was removed : http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-July/008911.html ? Qoute from that e-mail: "But there is at least one way to do that, it's creating a dummy package, with the same list of dependencies as in the PKGBUILD, and work with that in libalpm." Yes, this is what I said, except we use the db/depends instead of PKGBUILD.
Yes, but I was mostly asking about the implementation from Aurelien that was removed. If finally it was ok and it should be added back, or if it should be implemented in another better way.